<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s wrong with Outlook? &#8211; Tatham Oddie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geekyjohn.com/2009/07/what%e2%80%99s-wrong-with-outlook-tatham-oddie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geekyjohn.com/2009/07/what%e2%80%99s-wrong-with-outlook-tatham-oddie/</link>
	<description>My take on web things. Sometimes witty. Sharing of stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:01:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robocopy Log Scanner</title>
		<link>http://blog.geekyjohn.com/2009/07/what%e2%80%99s-wrong-with-outlook-tatham-oddie/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Robocopy Log Scanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geekyjohn.com/?p=205#comment-821</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I havent started sending &#039;pretty&#039; coded emails yet... (lots of \n in mine) but it seems like a minefield. Why can&#039;t it be standardised? Emails have been around for longer than HTML, and that&#039;s finally got the attention it needed...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I havent started sending &#8216;pretty&#8217; coded emails yet&#8230; (lots of \n in mine) but it seems like a minefield. Why can&#8217;t it be standardised? Emails have been around for longer than HTML, and that&#8217;s finally got the attention it needed&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
